2
THE DESIGN BRIEF
3
DESIGN CHARRETTE ADVISORY BOARD
4
DESIGN CHARRETTE TEAM LEADERS
1 DESIGN PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
The emerging local, provincial and federal
policies for sustainable development provide the basis for the following
performance criteria. Major sources used by the charrette organizers
to arrive at these performance criteria include: The British Columbia
Energy Council, Planning Today for Tomorrow’s Energy: An Energy Strategy
for British Columbia (BCEC); BC
Hydro, Bringing Electricity to the Livable Region (BCH);
The City of Vancouver, Clouds of Change, Final Report of the City
of Vancouver Task Force on Atmospheric Change (CV);
The Commission of Resources and Environment: Finding Common Ground:
A Shared Vision for Land Use in British Columbia (CORE);
The Province of British Columbia: Municipal Act Section 942 and Section
945 (Growth Management Legislation) (MA);
The Greater Vancouver Regional District: Livable Region Strategic
Plan (LRSP); BC Transit, Transit
and Land Use Planning (BCT); Official
Community Plan for Burnaby British Columbia (BOCP);
Brentwood Town Centre Development Plan (BTCP);
The Nature of Burnaby: An Environmentally Sensitive Areas Strategy,
Draft (ESA); In Transit. People Moving
People (IT); Light Rail Transit and
Growth Management in Vancouver, BC, Canada (LRT);
A Long-Range Transportation Plan for Greater Vancouver (LTP);
Managing Greater Vancouver’s Growth (MGVG);
Northeast Light Rail Transit Service Plan Concepts, Draft (NLRT);
The State of the Environment Report for Burnaby (SOER);
The Brentwood Town Centre Development Plan (TCP); Transit and Land
Use Planning (TLUP); Best Management
Practices Plan for Still Creek in the Brunette Watershed, Final Report
(WBMP); Still Creek – Brunette Basin
Issues and Proposed Actions, Draft Report (WSCBB);
Water quality and Stormwater Contaminants in the Brunette River Watershed,
British Columbia, 1994/95, Final Report (WWQ).
These reports and regulations were available for each team’s reference.
Policy directives included in these reports
that have an obvious impact on site and community design have been
converted into design performance criteria and are listed below
in three categories: land and water, the built environment, and
energy use. These criteria all support the goal of more sustainable
neighbourhoods and communities; however, they are often contradictory
when applied. For example, increasing housing density may negatively
affect ground and surface water quality. These performance criteria
should provide designers with a basic framework for design. Participants
are encouraged to interpret and expand on these policies via the
production of a specific design for the site. Each team’s design
for the site must reflect a clear vision for the district within
the larger plan for the future of Burnaby.
Land and Water
The goal of British Columbian and Canadian
public policy is to protect the ecological integrity of our land
and rivers, both for their intrinsic value and for their value to
present and future citizens. The charrette organizers assume that
urban development that protects the ecological integrity of the
land and water must start “from the ground up.” The ecological health
of the region is dependent on the ecological health of the sites
that make up the region. For example, degraded stormwater (non-point
source pollution) shipped “off sites” into streams and tributaries,
is the major threat to the health of Georgia Basin salmon streams.
The charrette site constitutes a significant portion of the Brunette
River watershed. The relatively slow moving Still Creek is the primary
threat to this system. Water quality and habitat capability of the
Brunette system have been seriously degraded. For these and other
reasons, the site can be considered very sensitive to development.
Our challenge is to invent an infrastructure of bioremediation that
includes streets and public spaces and that serves a number of ecological
functions. These functions include: remediating the down-stream
consequences of increased urbanization, adding amenity and recreational
value to the public realm; and saving money when compared to conventional
infrastructure. The following points should be considered carefully
within all design proposals.
Back
1. Infrastructure
Propose new types of public infrastructure
capable of bio-remediating urban pollution as close as possible
to its source. Integrate stormwater best management practices
into the fabric of the urban infrastructure. Maximize any
recreational and/or aesthetic possibilities that emerge as
a result. Maximize the impacts of infrastructure expenditures
by building in recreation, multi-modal transportation, ecological
enhancement, and bioremediation functions into the system.
Do so in ways that cost less than conventional single function
infrastructure. Integrate water quality BMP designs for this
purpose.1
2. Environmental Protection
Protect and enhance all environmentally
sensitive and/or degraded areas (i.e., wetlands, watercourses,
ravines, and watersheds, groundwater recharge areas, critical
wildlife habitat areas, and areas with fragile or unstable
soils) while maintaining and/or enhancing the ecological
performance of native habitats, hydrology, and landforms.2
3. Open Space Linkage
Preserve, create, and link urban and
rural open space, including parks and recreation areas.
Maintain and enhance public access to streams, where environmentally
sustainable.3
4. Open Space Quality
Identify and enhance spatial recreation
opportunities within the site, (i.e., streams, topographic
features, natural areas etc.) 4
5. Sanitary Systems
Consider the integration of district
sewage treatment and sewage treatment marshes.5
|
The Built Environment
The goal of British Columbian and Canadian public
policy is to provide adequate, affordable, and appropriate housing
for all citizens. A more sustainable site and community design must
integrate, not segregate, land uses, income groups, and family types.
Services and jobs must be located near homes and transit. The Brentwood
Town Centre Development Plan integrates land uses placing housing
close to commercial services, jobs, and transit. Ways of integrating
various economic strata within the community have not yet been determined
and need to be explored.
The Brentwood Town Centre Development Plan proposes
accommodating 9300 residential units on the 250 acres (figure does
not include rights-of-ways) that will eventually be residential or
mixed use residential, for an average residential density on these
lands of roughly 30 units per acre. Approximately half of these units
are proposed to be high density with the remaining half to be medium
density. No single family dwelling zones (or zones of detached single
family areas) are suggested, although the surrounding area is dominated
by this use. Regional policy encourages accomodating the bulk of new
population in “ground-oriented housing.”6
Ground-oriented housing is defined as housing where each unit has
its own access to the street or a public/semi public exterior realm.
Sensitive architectural approaches are needed for this type of housing.
The present market is dominated by a small handful of project types.
Many of the larger projects in this category are organized to the
interior of the site, draining adjacent streets of activity and promoting
a walled off quality for the project. Often this result is the unintended
consequence of otherwise legitimate traffic safety concerns (such
as restricting the number of curb cuts on new projects to one or two).
The relationship between the regulatory framework, traffic safety
concerns, subdivision regulations, and market forces is not well understood.
The Charrette will hopefully produce an expanded palette of project
types for this burgeoning new market by striking a balance between
urban design considerations and regulatory conventions. Accordingly,
each design should reflect the following points.
Back
1. Housing Equity
Provide a balance of housing types that
meet the needs of a range of ages and lifestyles and are affordable
to groups and individuals within a wide range of incomes.
At least 20 percent (a minimum of 720 units if 10,000 persons
inhabit the site) of the housing shall be for persons with
family incomes in the bottom third. Income statistics for
Burnaby residents are listed in
the appendix.7
2. Special Needs Housing
Provide adequate special needs housing
for seniors, disabled, family crisis victims, etc. as per
Burnaby demographic information.8
3. Safety
Employ proven methods of enhancing
community safety and sociability.9
4. Jobs
Provide work space in commercial,
office, or light industrial facilities for the working population
at a rate of one job for every dwelling unit. We are assuming
350 workspaces will be required for each 1,000 residents.10
5. Housing Types
Expand the palette of ground oriented
housing types. Housing should enhance, not take away from,
life on the street. Suggest strategies for parcelization
that would promote diversity and enhance street vitality.
Examine ways of handling car arrival that will not detract
from street life.11
|
Public Transit
The goal of British Columbian and Canadian
public policy is to provide inexpensive, convenient, fast, and frequent
public transit for as many of its citizens as possible. In this
way dependence on the private automobile can be stabilized and then
reduced. Environmental goals cannot be achieved if the rate of auto
dependence is not reversed. Public expenditures for auto-related
infrastructure would soon be out of control. The Brentwood Town
Centre will be served by a light rail line that will connect the
Broadway Corridor in Vancouver to the City of Coquitlam. The Brentwood
Town Centre lies roughly at the halfway point of this proposed line.
There are many North American cities where light rail transit enhances
the livability of the districts through which it passes. However,
fitting light rail transit into the Brentwood Town Centre in a way
that enhances community life is a challenge. The Lougheed Highway
right-of-way must somehow include the rail line while still handling
four lanes of inter-urban traffic. The intersection of Lougheed
and Willingdon is already highly congested and likely to get worse
before regional transit improvements have any impact. The existing
right-of-way is already an imposing barrier for pedestrians and
cyclists. Design teams should give special attention to these important
issues and consider the following in their designs.
Back
1. Access to Transit
All residents of the new Brentwood district
will live within an easy walk to transit. Examine ways of
connecting pedestrians and bikes to transit nodes that further
enhance access and convenience of transit for residents. Examine
ways of connecting residential districts that lie outside
the site to major transit nodes. 12
2. Multi-modal Movement to
Transit Nodes
Provide safe, comfortable, barrier-free
and direct pedestrian access to the transit route. Provide
a multi-modal circulation system that gives walking and
biking priority over automobile travel. 13
|
Energy Use
The goal of British Columbian and Canadian public
policy is to reduce energy consumption (and the pollution that this
consumption causes) even while population continues to increase. Any
progress toward a more sustainable future will require large per capita
reductions in the amount of energy required for building construction
and transportation. Many of the gains to be made in this area lie
in the realm of improved building technologies and improved vehicle
efficiencies, and are thus outside the scope of this site and community
design demonstration project (except for energy benefits accruing
from increased use of transit). However, certain site and community
design factors can powerfully affect the amount of energy required
for building conditioning and transportation.
District heating can be practical at certain
densities and site configurations. Solar access for winter warmth
is significant in our region, where the coldest winter days tend also
to be the sunniest (the site has a most favourable aspect for solar
heating). West facing dwelling units (with the large expanses of glass
common in our region) require summer air condition – even though our
summers are quite cool. Urban forests can significantly influence
energy use. Charrette participants are challenged to design the site
with due regard for climatic imperatives.
Integrating land uses and accommodating pedestrians
and bicycles saves energy. Designers should show how pedestrians
and bicycles are accommodated and how destinations are located within
walking distance of services, transit, and jobs.
Back
1. Solar Heat
Reduce building energy re quirements
by providing optimal solar orientation, solar access, passive
solar heating, and day-lighting. 14
2. Energy Infrastructure
Aim for the efficient use of utility
infrastructure by considering utility system design as part
of the community design. Consider the possibility of natural
on-site sewage treatment. 15
3. Alternative Energy
Provide as appropriate (or maintain
flexibility to provide in the future) energy service
from alternative technologies such as community scale generating
systems, district heating and co-generation. 16
4. Design with Climate
Enhance community microclimate through
design response to wind, sum, vegetation, and precipitation.
17
|
2
THE DESIGN BRIEF
This design brief should be the basis for your proposals. The charrette
organizers have made every effort to ensure that the brief will
promote comparability between the different teams without limiting
your design discretion and expression.
The plan you propose will take up to thirty years to carry out.
During that time, land ownership and land tenure will naturally
turn over to the land uses delineated in the Brentwood Town Centre
Development Plan. You should assume that most existing site infrastructure
(i.e. streets [except Lougheed Highway] bridges, sewer lines, etc.)
would need reconstruction during this period, and could be realigned
or reconfigured in conformance with your proposals if there were
a compelling reason to do so.
Each team should determine the choice and relative proportion of
dwelling types. The Brentwood Town Centre Development Plan calls
for 9,300 dwelling units in the district, roughly half of these
units in high rise structures, the other half in ground-oriented
units. Design teams must find ways to accommodate this density on
the site. At the same time, public preference for free hold dwellings
and dwellings with private yards (even very small ones) is very
strong. Ways can and should be found to accommodate this natural
housing preference.
The site sits astride and directly uphill from a highly sensitive
aquatic environment. Protecting this environment is of utmost importance.
Based on the information provided, charrette participants should
decide how best to protect and perhaps enhance the ecological function
of the site and the adjacent Still Creek system.
The commercial space requirements listed below are 200 percent
higher per thousand residents than the average number of square
feet commercial space per thousand throughout the region. These
number suggest that most of the residents in the communities you
propose will make their major purchases in the community and that
the community will continue to attract the majority of its customers
from the surrounding areas.
Light industrial and office space requirements support the City
of Burnaby’s desire to provide one job for every worker (18 - 65
years old) within Burnaby. Finally, and perhaps most importantly,
the site is an element in the larger urban landscape – a cell in
a larger cultural and biophysical organism. The policies that inform
the program for this site will guide urban development throughout
the Province. Teams should seek ways to express their idea of this
larger context in their design proposal.
For the purposes of our charrette, the site has been broken into
two areas. The first area is the 400 acres covered in the Brentwood
Town Centre Development Plan. We have included an additional 190
acres to the south of the Brentwood Town Centre district. These
lands occupy the zone between the BNR rail right-of-way on the north,
and the centre line of Still Creek to the south. Industrial uses
cover the majority of these additional acres. The remaining land
is conservation land or unbuildable. The major ecological and engineering
constraint associated with all lands south of the rail line is peat
soil. Deep deposits of peat, saturated with groundwater, make these
acres both difficult to build on (pilings required for all structures)
and easily damaged. Charrette participants are to consider these
lands in their proposals.
Note that the City of Burnaby Planning Department does not anticipate,
nor is it proposing changes to the zoning of these areas.
However, the Brentwood Plan includes a schematic plan for connecting
the town centre with Still Creek and thence to the Burnaby Lake
green zone.
The specific program below only covers those acres considered in
the Brentwood Town Centre Development Plan. Teams are free
to treat the additional 190 acres in one of the four following ways:
Back
1. Presume no changes
south of the rail lines except to link the recreational and
ecological systems of the Brentwood Town Centre to Still Creek.
2. Presume that some
of the program requirements of this program could be “spread
out” south of the tracks (either integrating with or displacing
existing land uses).
|
3. Add intensity and density
to these lands without reducing the intensity and density of
the Brentwood Town Centre District (by locating dwelling units
in this area that allow the total number of dwelling units to
exceed the 9,300 figure cited below for example).
4. Propose that some
or all of this area gradually revert back to green as part
of an enlarged Burnaby Lake green zone.
|
Land Use Allocations
Commercial/Mixed Use |
51 acres |
Residential |
194 acres |
Industrial |
10 acres |
Service Commercial |
8 acres |
Public Open Space (includes school grounds) |
37 acres |
Cemeteries (existing) |
20 acres |
Road Rights-of-Way |
80 acres |
|
|
Total Site Area: |
400 acres
160 hectares |
Residents |
|
Proposed Community Population |
16,500 |
Proposed Total Dwelling Units |
9,300 |
Residential Parking Standard |
1.25 spaces per dwelling unit. 0.25
spaces per elderly or special needs unit.1
Parking can be on street or in surface lots. |
Public Transit |
|
|
One light rail stop on Lougheed Highway
is anticipated. The exact location of this stop is not definite
and should be suggested. Frequent bus connections to this transit
node from the north and south on Willingdon Street are available.
Consideration should be given to the urban design of this important
transit interchange.2 |
Commercial |
|
Commercial Space 3 |
1,500,000 sq. ft. (161,290 sq. m.)
90,000 sq. ft. (9,677 sq. m.)/ thousand |
Commercial Parking Standard |
750 sq. ft. or 70 sq. m. (3 spaces)
per 1,000 sq. ft. retail. On street, off street, and enclosed
parking.4 |
Light Industrial/Office
|
|
Light Industrial/Corporate Office Space |
25,000 sq. ft. (2,3300 sq. m.) per 1,000
population.5 |
Service Office Space |
16,000 sq. ft. (1,500 sq. m.) per 1,000
population.6 |
Light Industrial/Corporate Office/Service Office Parking Standard |
400 sq. ft. or 37 sq. m. (1.5 spaces)
per 1,000 sq. ft. (or 90 sq. m.) office/light industrial 7 |
Public Buildings
|
|
Elementary Schools |
Two Schools at 35,000 sq. ft. for 500
students, or one school at 70,000 sq. ft. for 1,000 students;
and access to 8 acres (3.25 hectares) of outdoor recreation
space. |
Childcare Facilities and Preschools |
2,560 sq. ft. (240 sq., m.) interior
space, 4,800 sq. ft. (445 sq. m.) exterior play space per 1,000
dwelling units. |
Community Centre and Library |
One at 36,000 sq. ft. (3,340 sq. m.)
on street or off street parking for 32 cars. |
Fire Hall |
One at 11,000 sq. ft. (1,020 sq. m.). |
Town Hall/Public Offices |
20,000 sq. ft. (1,860 sq. m.) for city
and provincial satellite health, records, social, job training
and other public functions. On street or off street parking
for 25 cars. |
Churches/Multi-Faith Centre with Assembly Hall |
One per 4,000 population at 10,000 sq.
ft. (930 sq. m.). On with Assembly Hall street or off
street parking for 60 cars. Parking can be shared
with non-competing use.8 |
|
|
Notes
1 This
number is one half the standard suburban residential parking
requirement. One half standard is assumed to be appropriate
for our purposes, given the “walking distance to services and
transit” assumption underlying this charrette.
Back
2 We anticipate
that this rail line will be constructed at grade and be similar
to the Portland, Oregon system. As proposed, this rail line
will be built within the existing Lougheed Highway right of
way. Changes to this alignment may be proposed; however, it
is nearly certain that this decision will not be reversed.
Back
3 This
figure represents over 200% of the 42,000 sq. ft. (3,900 sq.
m.) per 1,000 persons commercial floor space ratio that exists
in our region at this time. Since the Brentwood District serves
an area much larger than the 400 acre site, this is appropriate.
Back |
4 This
number is one half the standard suburban commercial requirement
cited in Time Saver Standards for Site Planning. The UDI standard
for retail parking is 5 to 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. (93 sq.
m.) of commercial space. One half standard is assumed to be
appropriate for our purposes, given the assumptions underlying
this charrette (i.e., reduced dependence on automobiles, increased
use of public transit).
Back
5 This
number is generated as follows: assume one job per household
(UDI) and 2.87 persons per household. The number of jobs for
the entire district should be 350 per 1,000 population. Assume
35 % of jobs are in corporate office/light industrial. 0.35X350
= 123 jobs. 123 jobs X 200 sq. ft. (19 sq. m.) per worker
= 25,000 sq. ft. (2,300 sq. m.) per 1,000 population.
Back
6 23%
of 350 workers per 1,000 population = 80 persons at 200+ sq.
ft. (19 sq. m.) per person = 16,000 sq. ft. (1,500 sq. m.)
per 1,000 population.
Back
|
7 This
number is one half the standard suburban light industrial/corporate
office parking space requirement cited in Time Saver Standards
for Site Planning. The UDI standard is 3.5 spaces per 1,000
sq. ft. of office. One half this standard is assumed appropriate
for our purposes given the “walking distance to jobs or transit”
assumption underlying this charrette.
Back
8 This
number is an estimate of the typical number of churches per
1,000 population in our region, including all denominations.
Back
|
3 DESIGN CHARRETTE ADVISORY
BOARD
The following individuals kindly agreed to serve as members on
the Sustainable Urban Landscape Advisory Board. This group met at
key points to advise on all aspects of the project plan, to select
the case study site, to review and amend the design program, and
to advise the Chair on appropriate follow-up activities subsequent
to the charrette event.
Mr. Michael Geller
Principal
The Geller Group
601 West Cordova
Vancouver, BC, V6B 1G1 |
Mr. Hugh Kellas
Administrator, Policy Development
Strategic Planning Dept. GVRD
4330 Kingsway
Burnaby, BC, V5H 4G8
|
Ms. Penelope Gurstein
Assistant Professor
UBC School of Community and Regional Planning
6333 Memorial Road
Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2
|
Mr. Burton Leon
Manager, Real Estate and Policy
14245 - 56th Avenue
Surrey, BC, V3X 3A2 |
Ms. Sue Haid
Ecosystem Planner
City of Burnaby
4949 Canada Way
Burnaby , B.C. V5G 1M2 |
Mr. Patrick Mooney
Director & Associate Professor
UBC Landscape Architecture Program
6368 Stores Road
Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4
|
Mr. Sandy Hirshen
Director and Professor
UBC School of Architecture
6333 Memorial Road
Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2 |
Mr. Kelvin Neufeld
Member, Legislative and Public Affairs Committee
Fraser Valley Real Estate Board
Surrey, BC, V3T 4W4
|
Mr. Kenji Ito
Assistant Director, Current Planning
City of Burnaby
4949 Canada Way
Burnaby , BC, V5G 1M2
|
Mr. Terry Partington
President, Partington Real Estate Advisors Ltd.
2580 Rosebery St
West Vancouver, BC, V7V-2Z9 |
Mr. Erik Karlsen
Director, Special Projects
B.C. Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
4th Floor, 800 Johnson Street
Victoria, BC, V7V 1X4 |
Mr. John Robinson
Director, UBC Sustainable Development Research Institute
Professor, UBC School of Geography
B5-2202 Main Mall
Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4
Back |
4 DESIGN CHARRETTE TEAM
LEADERS
Stephanie Bothwell, Landscape Architect
Stephanie is Director of the AIA Centre for Livable Communities. She
has served on the faculties of Auburn University, Radcliffe College,
and the Rhode Island School of Design. As the Senior Landscape Architect
for the City of Boston’s neighbourhood redevelopment agency, she directed
award winning planning, policy, program and implementation strategies
for rebuilding communities across the city. Stephanie’s many activities
include neighbourhood design seminars at Harvard for HUD, policy studies
for the Fannie Mae Foundation, and design assistance to communities
and institutions throughout the country. She is Chair of the Social
Equity Task Force for the New Urbanism, and co-founder of the Urbanists
of the South with Duany and Plater-Zyberk.
Back
Warren Byrd, Landscape Architect
Warren has taught as well as chaired in the Department of Landscape
Architecture at the University of Virginia for nineteen years. He
has received many awards including The Council of Educators Award
of Distinction, and the All University Outstanding Teacher Award
from the University of Virginia. Warren has served on numerous landscape
architecture juries throughout the United States and has lectured
extensively. Warren currently shares a private practice in Charlottesville,
Virginia that has collaborated on two nationally acclaimed, award-winning
housing and landscape design competitions.
Back
Joyce Drohan, Architect
Joyce Drohan is driven by an interest in architecture’s role in
the larger urban context, which began while working with George
Baird at the University of Toronto. She has had the opportunity
to work with some of the country’s leading architecture/urban design
firms, including James A. Murray, Architect, in Toronto, and Bruno
Freschi Architects and Hotson Bakker Architects, of Vancouver. Her
recent work includes: implementation of a revitalization study for
Hastings Street in North Burnaby; additions, renovations and seismic
upgrade to UBC’s Faculty of Education complex; a downtown plan for
the City of Port Coquitlam; and a handbook for the design of building
frontages on one of downtown Vancouver’s prime civic corridors,
named Granville Street.
Back
Glenn Harrington, Landscape Architect
Glenn Harrington is President of Harrington and Hoyle Ltd., a broad-based
landscape architectural firm with offices in Markham and Cambridge,
Ontario. He specializes in land reclamation, aggregate resource
planning, and wetland creation, with a particular focus on stream
restoration and naturalization. Glenn’s innovative projects have
been featured in articles, presentations, and television productions,
earning him recognition as a pioneer of bioengineering technology
in Canada. As Chair of the Water Task Force, he has represented
the Conservation Council of Ontario on numerous provincial and international
water management panels.
Back
Peter Jacobs, Landscape Architect
Peter Jacobs is a professor of Landscape Architecture at the University
of Montreal who has also taught at the Harvard Graduate School of
Design, the Technion in Israel, the Universite de Paris, and the
Universidad del Valle in Cali, Columbia. He has acted as Invited
Scholar at the University of British Columbia and at Harvard University.
Peter serves as an urban design consultant to the City of Montreal
and has designed a number of award winning projects for urban open
spaces. He has spent twenty years working with the Inuit in Northern
Quebec on environmental impact assessments and community development
projects. Peter has also served on many Canadian and international
scientific committees, including the five editorial committees he
sits on now.
Back
Doug Kelbaugh, Architect
Doug is Dean of Architecture and Urban Design at the University
of Michigan. His designs have been published in over 100 books and
magazines and featured in many exhibitions worldwide. Doug has taught
and lectured at many schools of architecture throughout the US and
Europe, including, most recently, as Professor of Architecture and
Urban Design at the University of Washington. His accomplishments
include co-editing The Pedestrian Pocket Book, co-chairing four
national and international conferences on energy and design, organizing
over a dozen national and international design charrettes and consulting
on private and public development projects locally and abroad.
Back
Don Luymes, Landscape Architect
Don has a BLA from UBC and a MLA from the University of Guelph.
He practised as a landscape architect with firms in Vancouver, Guelph
and Toronto — most notably with Hough Stansbury Woodland as a project
manager. In 1992 Don was appointed to the faculty in Landscape Architecture
at Penn State University where he taught and conducted research
for four years, before returning to Vancouver to take a joint appointment
in the Landscape Architecture Program and the Department of Forest
Resources Management at UBC. Don has received awards for his design
work, teaching and professional practice. Don's interests
lie in site design (particularly of parks, public landscapes and
settlements), cultural aspects of designed places, and design criticism.
He is currently involved in several projects that deal with issues
of the urban/rural interface.
Back
Christopher MacDonald, Architect
Christopher was educated at the University of Manitoba and the Architectural
Association in London. He has been involved in architectural education
in various capacities for the past twenty years as well as maintaining
an engagement in practice. He is now the Director of the School
of Architecture at the University of British Columbia. Work undertaken
by his London partnership of MacDonald and Salter was widely exhibited
and published through the 1980s, with work including participation
in the IBA urban design project in West Berlin as well as numerous
architectural scaled pieces.
Back
Brian MacKay-Lyons, Architect
Brian is a practicing architect based in Nova Scotia, Canada, and
a faculty member at the Technical University of Nova Scotia School
of Architecture in Halifax. He received his BArch. from TUNS in
1978 and his MArch. from UCLA in 1982. Brian has received over forty
awards for design, has been published internationally, and has taught
at the Harvard Graduate School of Design.
Back
Bill McGuinness, Architect
Bill graduated from UBC with degrees in Architecture (1989) and
Sociology (1985). He worked in the architectural profession for
two years with Blue Sky West and John Hollyfield, Architects. He
then moved to the real estate development industry in which he has
worked with the Adera Group of Companies in Vancouver. Bill is responsible
for the design and approval of apartment and townhouse projects,
and as such assembles and works with teams of architects, landscape
architects, engineers and interior designers as required to bring
about marketable new communities.
Back
Freda Pagani, Architect
Freda is Director of Sustainability, Land and Building Services
at the University of British Columbia and is responsible for the
implementation of the UBC Sustainable Development Policy. During
her previous role as Associate Director, Project Development in
Campus Planning and Development, she initiated the C.K. Choi Building,
on the UBC Campus, as a demonstration ‘green’ building and is now
completing a Ph. D. in Resource Management and Environmental Studies
at UBC which builds on her experience with that project. She has
lectured widely and published papers on environmentally responsible
design and has been selected as an adjudicator in architectural
competitions with environmental criteria. Her deep commitment to
the crucial issues of sustainability is expressed through her activities
on committees and boards of several organizations devoted to promoting
socially and environmentally responsible design.
Back
Douglas D. Paterson, Landscape Architect
Doug obtained his BSc. from the University of Manitoba in 1964 and
his MLA from the University of Michigan in 1967. He was a founding
partner in a major interdisciplinary environmental planning firm
in Western Canada called the Lombard North Group. In the past he
served on the editorial advisory boards of Landscape Architecture
Magazine and the Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning. Doug also
acted as president of the Canadian Society of Landscape Architects,
chaired the CSLA College of Fellows, and was Regional Director of
the North American Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture.
He has been teaching Landscape Architecture at UBC since 1980.
Back
Kim Perry, Landscape Architect
Kim has been in private practice in Western Canada for the past
twenty-four years since emigrating from Washington State in 1975.
The work of his firm, Perry and Associates Inc.,
in Vancouver, has focussed on public open space design of waterfronts,
urban design and large scale site planning. Several of these projects
have been recognized with awards from the Canadian Society of Landscape
Architects, The Canadian Home-builders Association and the Waterfront
Centre. From 1986 to 1991 Kim served as a sessional lecturer in
the UBC Landscape Architecture Program. Recently, projects include
the 900-acre Swan-e-set Bay Resort Community, the BC Packers lands
in Steveston BC, and the Ridgeway Greenway in the city of Vancouver.
Back
Donald Prowler, Architect
Donald is a practicing architect and member of the Architecture
Faculties of both Princeton University and the University of Pennsylvania
in Philadelphia. He graduated cum laude from Princeton University
in 1972 and received his MArch. from the University of Pennsylvania
in 1975. His research, practice and teaching on sustainable and
resource responsive architecture earned him the 1983 Progressive
Architecture Research Award for his work on energy curriculum development
for architecture schools, and positions such as Program Chairman
of the 1983 International Daylighting Conference. He currently serves
as Chairman of the Passive Solar Industries Council.
Back
Garth Rockcastle, Architect
Garth received his BArch. at Pennsylvania State University in 1974
and his MArch. (Urban Design) at Cornell University in 1976. In
1989 Garth was awarded Excellence on the Waterfront Top Honor for
the Cinncinati Gateway and in 1997 received the College of Architecture
and Landscape Architecture’s Frederick J. Mann Award for Disciplinary
Service. His professional accomplishments include the Sahara Wets
Museum & Library, Las Vegas, NV, and the St. Anthony Phase IV,
Minneapolis, MN. Garth was Assistant, then Associate Professor
at the College of Architecture and Landcsape Architecture in Minnesota
from 1978 to 1991, and has been acting Professor and Head at CALA
for the last eight years.
Back
W. Paul Rosenau, Planner
Paul is the principal of EKISTICS, which consists of an energetic
team of architects, landscape architects, planners and urban designers.
Along with his associates, he is spearheading a rethinking of standard
land development models and their underlying assumptions. Paul’s
accomplishments include traditional town designs for Murray’s Corner
in Langley, B.C., Kettle Valley Properties in Kelowna, B.C., Straiton
Neighbourhood in the Sumas Mountains of Abbotsford, B.C., and Terwillegar
Towne in Edmonton, Alberta.
Back
Bob Worden, Architect
Bob is principal of Ramsay Worden Architects Ltd. in Vancouver.
He has earned a reputation for innovative design in established
contexts and neighbourhoods — design which both serves the needs
of new users while also supporting the patterns and character of
existing neighbourhoods. His work with both the development and
planning community has covered a wide spectrum of medium density
forms — from traditional rear lane subdivisions to fee simple rowhousing,
to contemporary townhouse and apartment developments. Much of his
effort is focused on the patterns of public/private integration,
the primary goal being to create the intimacy and neighbourliness
inherent in traditional neighbourhoods. Bob is currently involved
the "Headwaters Project", another project of the James Taylor Chair,
which is aimed at applying principles of sustainable site design.
Back
|